Evaluation for a Caring Society
A volume in the series: Evaluation and Society. Editor(s): Jennifer C. Greene, University of Illinois - Champaign. Stewart I. Donaldson, Claremont Graduate University.
This book highlights views on responsive, participatory and democratic approaches to evaluation from an ethos of care. It critically scrutinizes and discusses the invisibility of care in our contemporary Western societies and evaluation practices that aim to measure practices by external standards. Alternatively, the book proposes several foci for evaluators who work from a care perspective or wish to encourage a caring society. This is a society that sees evaluation and care as a continuously unfolding relational practice of moral-political learning contributing to life-sustaining webs.
‘At one level is the evaluator’s immediately responsive and interpersonal encounter with the personal troubles of social actors, most visible, as Mills originally pointed out, in an individual’s biography and in those social settings directly open to the individual’s lived experience. (...) At another level, the sociological and political level, the evaluator operates at what Mills called the arena of public issues where immediate personal troubles are seen not only as problems encountered by individuals but as the result of structural and political arrangements in society (...) evaluation for a caring society is thought to operate at both levels’ (Thomas A. Schwandt, Professor Emeritus, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
‘The intricate relationship between evaluation and care is hardly addressed by evaluators or caregivers. This book fills a gap, as it focuses on the relationship between evaluation and care and provides a multitude of examples of evaluation as a caring practice (...) the book can serve as an antidote to the present-day haste in social practices, and contribute, in form and content, to developing an evaluation practice which may foster a caring society’ (Guy Widdershoven, Professor of Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine and head of the Department of Medical Humanities at VU University Medical Center, VU University Amsterdam).
Foreword, Thomas Schwandt. Foreword, Guy Widdershoven. Acknowledgements. Introduction, Merel Visse and Tineke Abma. On the Photo-Story of the Carefreestate, Tineke Abma, Merel Visse, and Janine Schrijver. PART I: THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS ON A CARING SOCIETY. Care, Competency, and Knowledge, Maurice Hamington. The Art of Understanding, Karin Dahlberg. PART II: DEMOCRATIC EVALUATION FOR A CARING SOCIETY. Democratic Evaluation and Care Ethics, Helen Simons and Jennifer C. Greene. Democratic Caring Evaluation for Refugee Children in Sweden, Anders Hanberger. PART III: ETHICS AND EVALUATION FOR A CARING SOCIETY. Uncontrolled Evaluation: The Case of Telecare Innovations, Jeannette Pols. Evaluation for Moving Ethics in Health Care Services Towards Democratic Care: A Three Pillars Model: Education, Companionship, and Open Space, Helen Kohlen. PART IV: RESPONSIVE EVALUATION FOR A CARING SOCIETY. Responding to Otherness: The Need for Experimental-Relational Spaces, Gustaaf Bos and Tineke Abma. Dialogue, Difference, and Care in Responsive Enactments of a World-Becoming, Melissa Freeman. Responsive Evaluation as a Way to Create Space for Sexual Diversity: A Case Example on Gay-Friendly Elderly Care, Hannah Leyerzapf, Merel Visse, Arwin de Beer, and Tineke Abma. Evaluation for a Caring Society: Toward New Imaginaries, Merel Visse and Tineke Abma. About the Contributors.
Web price: $39.09 (Reg. 45.99)
Web price: $73.09 (Reg. 85.99)
- MED043000 - MEDICAL: Hospital Administration & Care
- MED050000 - MEDICAL: Ethics
- MED011000 - MEDICAL: Caregiving
- Continuing the Journey to Reposition Culture and Cultural Context in Evaluation Theory and Practice
- Democratic Evaluation and Democracy Exploring the Reality
- Evaluating Values, Biases, and Practical Wisdom
- Evaluation for an Equitable Society
- Evaluation Use and Decision-Making in Society A Tribute to Marvin C. Alkin
- Evaluative Research Methods Managing the Complexities of Judgment in the Field
- Outcome Harvesting Principles, Steps, and Evaluation Applications